Underpayments absorbed silently
If nothing compares the payment to the expected contracted rate, a short payment posts exactly like a correct one. The loss is invisible and, because it repeats, it compounds.
Payment posting looks like data entry until it is done badly. Posted carelessly, a payment hides an underpayment, buries a denial, or creates a patient balance that should never have been billed — and each of those errors is harder to find after the fact than it would have been to prevent.
Payment posting records what each payer actually paid, preserving the adjustment and remark codes that explain any reduction. Postings are reconciled to bank deposits and compared against contracted rates, so underpayments surface instead of posting silently as correct payments.
Rev Cura posts electronic remittances and paper EOBs with the adjustment and remark codes preserved, reconciles postings against deposits, and flags variances between what your contract says you should have been paid and what actually arrived.
Posting is also the earliest point at which a denial becomes visible. A remittance frequently contains refusals alongside payments, and a posting process that does not route those into the denial workflow is losing claims at the exact moment it could have caught them.
If nothing compares the payment to the expected contracted rate, a short payment posts exactly like a correct one. The loss is invisible and, because it repeats, it compounds.
Adjustment and remark codes explain why a line was reduced or refused. Collapsed into a single write-off at posting, that information is gone and the claim is never worked.
When posted totals do not tie to deposits, the practice cannot tell whether the difference is a timing issue, a posting error or money that never arrived.
Misapplied deductible, co-insurance or contractual adjustment produces a statement to a patient who does not owe it — the most expensive kind of billing error to unwind.
Overpayments sitting unresolved are both a distortion of the ledger and an obligation that does not go away by being ignored.
Remittances posted with adjustment and remark codes preserved at line level, so the reason for every reduction survives into your system.
Paper EOBs, correspondence and patient payments posted with the same level of detail rather than as bulk entries.
Postings reconciled to deposits so that nothing goes missing between the payer, the bank and the ledger.
Payments compared against expected contracted rates, with shortfalls flagged as variances for follow-up rather than accepted as final.
Refusals and reductions found inside remittances are routed straight into the denial workflow the same day, with the cause already recorded.
Overpayments and credits are surfaced for proper handling instead of being left to accumulate.
In your system, tied to your deposits, with codes intact.
Payments that fell short of the expected contracted rate, ready to be worked.
Extracted from remittances rather than left inside them.
What is owed back and to whom, surfaced rather than buried.
Agreed at the start of the engagement, reported on a fixed rhythm, with commentary rather than a raw export.
We report your figures. We do not publish benchmark numbers we cannot evidence for your practice.
Posting happens in your practice management system, so your books remain the single source of truth. We do not maintain a shadow ledger.
Refunding an overpayment is a decision for your practice. We identify credit balances and prepare the detail; the payment itself is yours to make.
Contracted rate comparison depends on having current contract terms. Where a fee schedule is missing or out of date we will tell you, because variance review without it is guesswork.
Yours. Posting happens in your practice management system so your books remain the single source of truth.
It is flagged as a variance and worked as an underpayment. It is not written off automatically, because an automatic write-off is how systematic underpayment becomes invisible.
Turnaround is agreed as part of onboarding and reported against, because slow posting delays every downstream step including denial work.
For variance review, yes — expected rates come from your contracted fee schedules. Without them we can post accurately but cannot tell you when you have been underpaid.
We identify and report them with the supporting detail. Deciding and making a refund remains with your practice.
Yes, where it is needed to make the opening AR position accurate. It is scoped as part of transition rather than assumed.
Charge entry through payment, accurate and fully documented.
Explore →Cadences by payer and aging bucket that keep claims moving.
Explore →Root-cause categorization, appeals and prevention loops.
Explore →Speak with our team about your current billing workflow, AR challenges and revenue cycle goals.